Free reference — 99+ guides, IR playbooks, wRVU tracking, and more in RadCall Pro. Start 14-day free trial
Breast Updated 2026-04

Radiologic-Pathologic Concordance — Breast Biopsy

Breast biopsy concordance principles: concordant benign vs discordant results, common concordant benign pairs, discordant examples requiring action, and marker clip documentation.

Quick summary

After every percutaneous breast biopsy, the radiologist must determine whether the pathology result adequately explains the imaging finding. A result is concordant when the pathology is a known cause of the imaging appearance. Discordance mandates repeat sampling or surgical excision.

Concordance Framework

Concordant Benign — Imaging and pathology both benign → routine follow-up per BI-RADS recommendation. Confirm marker clip position on post-biopsy imaging.

Concordant Malignant — Imaging suspicious/malignant AND pathology shows malignancy → proceed with treatment planning (surgical oncology referral, staging workup).

Discordant — Benign path after suspicious imaging — Imaging is BI-RADS 4B, 4C, or 5 but pathology shows a benign finding → repeat core needle biopsy or surgical excision required. This is the most dangerous discordance scenario — the probability of malignancy implied by the BI-RADS category is not explained by the pathology.

Discordant — High-risk path after low-suspicion imaging — Imaging appears benign/low suspicion but pathology shows a high-risk lesion (ADH, LCIS, papilloma with atypia) → excision typically required. May represent undersampling.

BI-RADS 4C or 5 + benign pathology = discordant. A benign result after a highly suspicious image is almost never truly concordant — it implies either sampling error or a missed adjacent lesion. Repeat biopsy or surgical excision is the appropriate response.

Common Concordant Benign Pairs

Imaging Finding Pathology Result Status Follow-up
Oval circumscribed mass, BI-RADS 3 or 4A Fibroadenoma Concordant 6-month follow-up or return to annual per clinical context
Oval circumscribed mass, BI-RADS 3 Fibrocystic changes Concordant Continue BI-RADS 3 surveillance (6 mo → 12 mo → 24 mo)
Grouped amorphous calcifications, BI-RADS 4A Fibrocystic change ± sclerosing adenosis Concordant 6-month follow-up mammogram with magnification views
Simple cyst on US Benign cyst contents on aspiration Concordant Routine; re-image only if symptomatic recurrence
Oval circumscribed mass on MRI Fibroadenoma with dark septations Concordant Routine; correlate with mammography/US

Discordant Examples — Action Required

Imaging Finding Pathology Result Status Required Action
Spiculated mass, BI-RADS 5 Fibrocystic change — benign Discordant Repeat CNB or immediate surgical excision — BI-RADS 5 requires ≥95% probability; benign path is insufficient
Irregular mass with rim enhancement, BI-RADS 4C (MRI) Benign fibroadenoma Discordant Repeat biopsy — fibroadenoma does not cause rim enhancement; sampling error likely
Fine linear branching calcifications, BI-RADS 4C ADH (not DCIS) Discordant Surgical excision — fine linear calcs strongly suggest DCIS; ADH on core = likely undersampling of DCIS
Segmental NME on MRI, BI-RADS 4B Usual ductal hyperplasia only Discordant Surgical excision — segmental NME with UDH alone is discordant; DCIS must be excluded
BI-RADS 4A mass Phyllodes tumor (borderline) Discordant Surgical excision with clear margins — phyllodes at any grade requires excision; core cannot assess stromal overgrowth

Post-Biopsy Documentation


More in RadCall 99+ guides, IR procedure playbooks, systematic search patterns, case logging, and wRVU tracking — all in one place.
Start free trial ›