Indications & Contraindications
Indications
- Blunt or penetrating hepatic injury with contrast blush, pseudoaneurysm, or arteriovenous/arterioportal fistula on CTA
- AAST grade III–V injuries with arterial injury on imaging — almost 83% success rate for grade III–IV
- Hemodynamically stable or stabilizing patient (responding to resuscitation)
- Post-surgical hepatic bleeding — adjunct to damage control laparotomy
- Failure of nonoperative management (NOM) with hemodynamic instability and high suspicion for hepatic arterial bleed
- Decreasing serial hematocrit measurements suggesting ongoing arterial hemorrhage
Contraindications
- Hemodynamic instability requiring OR — damage control surgery takes priority; “lethal triad” of coagulopathy, acidosis, hypothermia = emergent laparotomy
- Hepatic vein / IVC injury — not amenable to arterial embolization; requires surgical repair
- Juxtahepatic venous injuries (grade V) — retrohepatic vena cava or central major hepatic veins = surgical
- Concurrent peritoneal irritation requiring laparotomy (missed bowel injury)
AAST Hepatic Injury Grading (2018 Update)
| Grade | Injury Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| I | Hematoma / Laceration | Subcapsular <10% surface area; capsular tear <1 cm depth |
| II | Hematoma / Laceration | Subcapsular 10–50%; intraparenchymal <10 cm; laceration 1–3 cm depth, <10 cm length |
| III | Hematoma / Laceration / Vascular | Subcapsular >50% or expanding; >3 cm depth; active bleeding contained within parenchyma |
| IV | Laceration / Vascular | 25–75% lobar disruption; 1–3 Couinaud segments; active bleeding beyond parenchyma into peritoneum |
| V | Laceration / Vascular | >75% lobar disruption; >3 Couinaud segments; juxtahepatic venous injuries (IVC/central hepatic veins) |
Pre-Procedure Planning
Imaging & Labs
- CTA abdomen/pelvis with arterial AND portal venous phases — identify contrast blush, pseudoaneurysm, AV fistula, and extent of parenchymal injury
- AAST grading based on CT findings — grade III–IV stable injuries typically warrant angiographic evaluation
- FAST exam in trauma bay — assess for free fluid; does not accurately estimate degree of injury
- Labs: CBC, CMP, coagulation parameters (PT/INR, fibrinogen), lactate, type & crossmatch
- Abnormal liver function may not manifest for hours to days post-injury
- Evaluate for concurrent injuries: spleen, kidney, bowel, diaphragm
Resuscitation & Coordination
- Massive transfusion protocol if needed — 1:1:1 ratio (pRBC : FFP : platelets)
- Assess for hepatic vein injury (retrohepatic IVC, major hepatic veins) — NOT amenable to embolization, requires surgical approach
- Direct communication with trauma surgery — establish plan: embolization first vs OR first vs adjunct post-surgical embo
- Interventional radiology team on standby in trauma bay for rapid transfer to angio suite
- Ensure angio suite is pre-set with microcatheter systems and embolic agents ready
Relevant Anatomy
Standard Hepatic Arterial Anatomy
- Celiac trunk → common hepatic artery → proper hepatic artery (after GDA takeoff)
- Proper hepatic artery bifurcates into right and left hepatic arteries
- Right hepatic artery (RHA) — supplies segments V–VIII; typically posterior to common bile duct
- Left hepatic artery (LHA) — supplies segments II–IV
- Middle hepatic artery (branch of LHA) — supplies segment IV
- Cystic artery typically arises from RHA
Variant Anatomy (Critical to Identify)
- Replaced RHA from SMA — occurs in 15–20% of patients; MUST inject SMA to evaluate for hepatic arterial injury in these patients
- Replaced LHA from left gastric artery — occurs in ~10% of patients
- Accessory hepatic arteries — supplemental supply in addition to standard anatomy
- Complete replaced common hepatic artery from SMA — rare (~2.5%)
- Always review CTA pre-procedure for aberrant anatomy; if not available, perform aortography or SMA injection during angiography
Dual Blood Supply — Key Concept
The liver receives dual blood supply: the hepatic artery provides ~25% of hepatic blood flow and the portal vein provides ~75%. This dual supply means the liver tolerates arterial embolization significantly better than other solid organs (spleen, kidney). However, in trauma patients with concurrent portal vein injury, shock liver, or post-surgical hepatic ischemia, the protective effect of dual supply is diminished — exercise greater caution with proximal embolization in these scenarios. Hepatic artery ligation/embolization carries increased necrosis risk when portal venous flow is compromised.
Technique
Arterial Access
Celiac Trunk Catheterization
Selective Hepatic Arteriogram
Check for Replaced RHA from SMA
Superselective Microcatheter Access
Embolization
Completion Angiography
Access Site Management & Transfer
Community Cards
Angiographic Landmarks
Standard Landmarks
- Celiac trunk — first major anterior branch off aorta at T12/L1; origin of common hepatic, splenic, and left gastric arteries
- Common hepatic artery → gives off GDA → continues as proper hepatic artery
- Proper hepatic artery — bifurcates into RHA and LHA; key vessel to identify before deploying microcatheter
- Right hepatic artery — anterior and posterior divisions; cystic artery branch
- Left hepatic artery — segments II, III, IV supply
Variant Anatomy Check
- SMA injection — ALWAYS perform if replaced RHA suspected or if RHA not visualized from celiac injection
- Replaced RHA from SMA — courses posterior to pancreatic head and portal vein to enter hepatic hilum
- Left gastric artery injection — if replaced LHA suspected
- Accessory arteries may supply the injured segment even when standard anatomy appears normal
Troubleshooting
Replaced Hepatic Artery Not Identified on Celiac Injection
If the right hepatic artery is not seen from the celiac trunk, always inject the SMA. Replaced RHA from SMA is present in 15–20% of patients. Similarly, if LHA not visualized, inject the left gastric artery. Failure to identify variant anatomy is the most common cause of missed injury and failed embolization.
Active Extravasation from Multiple Hepatic Branches
Systematically catheterize and embolize each injured branch superselectively. Gelfoam slurry may be preferred for diffuse multi-segment injury. If too many branches are involved for superselective approach, consider more proximal Gelfoam embolization of the right or left hepatic artery — but recognize increased ischemia risk. Completion angiography after each embolization to reassess.
Suspected Concurrent Portal Vein Injury
Portal venous injury is NOT amenable to arterial embolization. If CTA demonstrates portal vein extravasation or thrombosis, communicate immediately with trauma surgery. Arterial embolization in the setting of portal vein injury significantly increases hepatic necrosis risk due to loss of dual blood supply. Surgical management required for portal venous bleeding.
Concurrent Bile Duct Injury Identified
Biliary injury may be identified on CTA (periportal fluid, bile leak) or present as delayed complication. Does not preclude arterial embolization for active hemorrhage — hemorrhage control takes priority. MRCP post-stabilization to characterize biliary injury. May require subsequent percutaneous biliary drainage or ERCP with stenting.
Continued Hemorrhage Despite Embolization
Re-image from the celiac trunk and SMA to check for missed branches, replaced anatomy, or collateral supply to injury site. Consider hepatic vein or portal vein injury as source (not treatable with embolization). If arterial bleeding persists despite adequate embolization — communicate with surgery for emergent operative management. Ongoing hemodynamic instability = surgical intervention.
Complications
Hepatic Complications
- Hepatic infarction/necrosis (8.6%) — less common than other solid organs due to dual blood supply; risk increases with proximal embolization, concurrent portal vein injury, or post-surgical state
- Biloma (2.8%) — bile collection from injured bile ducts; may present days to weeks post-embolization; diagnose with CT or MRCP; treat with percutaneous drainage
- Hepatic abscess (6.8%) — secondary infection of necrotic/devitalized hepatic tissue; broad-spectrum antibiotics + percutaneous drainage
- Gallbladder infarction (3.6%) — cystic artery arises from RHA; risk with proximal RHA embolization; may require cholecystectomy
- Bile duct stricture — delayed complication from peribiliary ischemia; presents weeks to months later with biliary obstruction; MRCP for diagnosis
General & Vascular Complications
- Re-bleeding (6%) — post-embolization rebleeding from recanalization, missed branches, or new injury; monitor with serial H/H; repeat angiography if needed
- Abdominal compartment syndrome (2%) — massive hemorrhage or fluid resuscitation; bladder pressure monitoring; surgical decompression if needed
- Septic complications (0.6%) — peritonitis, sepsis from devitalized tissue or concurrent bowel injury
- Access site complications — hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, retroperitoneal hemorrhage from femoral access
- Non-target embolization — coil/particle migration to GDA, gastric, or splenic territories; superselective technique minimizes risk
Pearls & Pitfalls
References & Resources
Key Concepts
- Nonoperative management (NOM) is successful in ~80% of blunt hepatic trauma; embolization is critical adjunct when NOM fails
- Angiographic embolization has ~83% success rate for grade III–IV injuries
- Complication rates: ~28% overall; 6% rebleeding; 0.7% procedure-related mortality
Primary References
- Pillai AS, Kumar G, Pillai AK. Hepatic trauma interventions. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2021;38(1):96–104. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1724014
- Kozar RA, Crandall M, Shanmuganathan K, et al. Organ injury scaling 2018 update: spleen, liver, and kidney. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;85(6):1119–1122.
- Virdis F, Reccia I, Di Saverio S, et al. Clinical outcomes of primary arterial embolization in severe hepatic trauma: a systematic review. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2019;100(2):65–75.
- Padia SA, Ingraham CR, Moriarty JM, et al. Society of Interventional Radiology position statement on endovascular intervention for trauma. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020;31(3):363–369.
- Feliciano DV, Rozycki GS. Hepatic trauma. Scand J Surg. 2002;91(1):72–79.
- Taghavi S, Askari R. Liver Trauma. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls; 2020.