Indications / Contraindications
Indications
- Poor gastric distension despite air insufflation precluding safe retrograde transabdominal access
- Cannot identify safe stomach wall window to avoid colon or liver interposition via retrograde approach
- Patient/clinical preference for endoscopic approach; GI/surgery coordination preferred
- Esophageal or oropharyngeal anatomy that allows oral wire passage but stomach not safely accessible from outside
- Complex head/neck cancer patients where combined ENT + GI/IR approach is planned — though note tumor seeding risk below
The retrograde push technique (gastrostomy.html) is IR's preferred method — no endoscopy required, less sedation, less radiation, equivalent safety. The pull technique requires GI endoscopy and general/deep sedation. Default to push; use pull when push is not feasible.
Contraindications
- Same absolute contraindications as retrograde technique: no safe gastric window, massive ascites, uncorrectable coagulopathy
- Severe trismus or pharyngeal obstruction preventing safe oral scope passage (relative — transnasal endoscopy may be used)
- Completely obstructing esophageal mass where wire cannot be passed orally
- High aspiration risk without secured airway protection
Pull technique carries a risk of seeding head/neck cancer cells from oropharynx/esophagus to the abdominal tube site (estimated 0.5–3%). Many centers prefer retrograde technique for H&N cancer patients specifically to avoid this. Counsel patients and discuss with oncology/tumor board before proceeding.
Pre-Procedure Checklist
Relevant Anatomy
Stomach Anatomy & Target
- Same target as retrograde technique: anterior gastric body/antrum — most accessible, safest window
- Trans-oral wire path: pharynx → esophagus → stomach → under endoscopic visualization throughout
- Endoscopist controls wire placement and illuminates the anterior stomach wall with the endoscope light (transillumination technique) to guide IR's abdominal puncture site
- Avoid fundus (adjacent to spleen/diaphragm) and areas of liver overlap — same as retrograde
Transillumination Principle
- Transillumination: Endoscope light pressed against anterior stomach wall → visible as glow through abdominal wall in a darkened room → confirms safe puncture site
- Finger-press confirmation: IR presses finger firmly against transilluminated site → endoscopist sees indentation of stomach wall → bidirectional confirmation of correct location
- Both transillumination AND finger indentation must be positive before needle insertion — this two-step check is the safety equivalent of the gastropexy/fluoroscopy confirmation in the retrograde technique
- Danger structures (liver, colon) same as retrograde — review CT for position before starting
Technique
Coordinated IR + GI endoscopist pull technique + community cards
Supplies — IR
Supplies — GI Endoscopist
Steps
Patient positioning & anesthesia
Endoscopy & gastric insufflation
Transillumination
Finger-press bidirectional confirmation
IR puncture
Endoscopic snare capture
Wire exteriorization
Attach & pull G-tube
Position & secure
Final confirmation
Troubleshooting
Poor transillumination (obese patient)
Likely cause: Thick abdominal wall attenuating endoscope light.
Next step: Use brighter endoscope light setting. Darken room maximally. Switch to US to confirm stomach position and safe access window. May proceed with finger-press indentation technique alone if transillumination not visible but indentation is clear. CT guidance is an option in extreme cases.
Snare misses wire in stomach
Likely cause: Wire in suboptimal position, obscured by air/secretions, or snare size mismatch.
Next step: Reposition endoscope for better angle. Suction air and secretions. Try a different snare size (15–25 mm options). Confirm wire is still inside gastric lumen under fluoroscopy. Re-pass wire if needed.
Tube tears or breaks during pull
Likely cause: Jerky or asymmetric pulling; tube defect.
Next step: Ensure smooth, continuous tension without jerking. If tube tears within esophagus: endoscopic retrieval of remnant. If tear occurs at abdominal wall: call for backup PEG kit. Never leave tube fragments in esophagus or stomach.
Cannot pass endoscope (obstructing tumor)
Likely cause: Obstructing oropharyngeal or esophageal tumor preventing scope passage.
Next step: Switch to retrograde push technique (preferred IR approach — does not require oral access). Transnasal ultrathin endoscope may allow passage past high oropharyngeal tumors. If complete esophageal obstruction: retrograde push is the only percutaneous option.
Complications
Pull-Technique Specific
- Tumor seeding at abdominal site (0.5–3% for head/neck cancer pull technique) — malignant cells dragged from oropharynx/esophagus to tube site; most feared complication; leads to cutaneous metastasis at gastrostomy site
- Aspiration during procedure — general/MAC anesthesia with airway protection minimizes this risk; H&N patients at highest risk
- Buried bumper syndrome — inner bumper too tight initially causes pressure necrosis → bumper erodes into gastric mucosa; requires endoscopic or surgical removal
Standard G-tube Complications (shared with retrograde)
- Peristomal infection (most common delayed complication)
- Tube dislodgement — same protocol as retrograde; within 4 weeks = emergency
- Peritonitis (rare — from inner bumper erosion or tract leak)
- Bleeding — minor from dilation site; major rare
- Tube migration or occlusion; granulation tissue at site
Post-Procedure Care
Immediate (0–24h)
- Tube position check at 24h: Contrast injection through tube to confirm intragastric position before initiating feeds
- Feeds at 24h: Start at 20 mL/hr once position confirmed; advance over 24–48h
- Monitor for fever, abdominal pain, peritonitis signs
- Ensure inner bumper is not too tight — patient should be able to rotate tube slightly against skin
Ongoing Care
- Tube flushing: 30 mL water flush before and after each feed and medication; q4h if continuous feeding
- Site care: Daily cleaning around tube with mild soap and water. No submerging for 4 weeks.
- T-fastener removal: N/A for pull technique (no T-fasteners placed)
- Tube exchange: At 4–6 months (balloon-retained replacement); same protocol as push gastrostomy
Tube Dislodgement — Same Protocol as Retrograde Gastrostomy
- Dislodgement within 4 weeks = EMERGENCY. Do NOT attempt reinsertion at bedside. Return to IR for urgent fluoroscopic replacement or surgical referral immediately.
- Dislodgement after 4 weeks: Mature fistula tract — bedside Foley catheter replacement acceptable as bridge. Return to IR within 2–4 hours before tract closes.
Critical Pearls
Push vs. Pull Technique Comparison
| Feature | Retrograde Push (IR Default) | Antegrade Pull (PEG) |
|---|---|---|
| Endoscopy required | No | Yes (GI team) |
| Sedation level | Moderate sedation | General/MAC |
| Procedure time | 30–45 min | 45–60 min |
| Fluoroscopy | Yes (primary guidance) | Minimal/optional |
| Tumor seeding risk | None | 0.5–3% (H&N cancer) |
| Colon avoidance method | Fluoroscopic visualization | Transillumination + finger-press |
| IR independent | Yes | No — requires GI team |
| Preferred for H&N cancer | Yes (no seeding risk) | No (seeding risk) |
| Gastropexy (T-fasteners) | Yes (standard) | No |
| When pull is preferred | — | Retrograde gastric access not safe; complex anatomy; GI preference |
Enteral Access Decision Context
- Standard gastric access needed → Retrograde push gastrostomy (see gastrostomy.html)
- Retrograde push not feasible, oral access available → This page (pull technique)
- Aspiration risk / gastroparesis with existing G-tube → GJ tube conversion (see gj-tube.html)
- No stomach present / GJ tube fails → Direct jejunostomy (see j-tube.html)
References & Resources
Key Guidelines
- ASGE Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition
- ASGE Technology Committee on PEG
- SIR Standards of Practice
Primary References
- Gauderer MW et al. Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg. 1980;15(6):872-875.
- Ponsky JL, Gauderer MW. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a nonoperative technique for feeding gastrostomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1981;27(1):9-11.
- Schrag SP et al. Complications related to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes. A comprehensive clinical review. J Gastrointest Liver Dis. 2007;16(4):407-418.