Upper GI series interpretation: single vs double contrast technique, gastric ulcer vs carcinoma features, duodenal findings, linitis plastica, and post-surgical anatomy.
Quick summary
The upper GI series evaluates the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum using fluoroscopy and barium (or water-soluble contrast for suspected perforation). Single contrast assesses gross morphology and motility; double contrast provides superior mucosal detail for early mucosal lesions.
Greater curvature and cardia ulcers carry higher malignancy risk. Any gastric ulcer on fluoroscopy requires endoscopy with biopsy for definitive tissue diagnosis — fluoroscopy cannot exclude malignancy. Report features favoring benign vs. malignant morphology, but recommend endoscopy.
Anterior wall ulcers fill with barium only in supine or prone positions — profile views missed on upright study; always obtain multiple positions
Missing subtle linitis plastica
Insufficient distension of the stomach mimics linitis plastica; maximize CO2 and barium volume; true linitis plastica persists despite adequate distension
Duodenal bulb scarring vs. active ulcer
Scarred/deformed bulb from old disease vs. active ulcer niche — active ulcer = barium collection persisting after compression; scarring = fixed deformity without niche
SMA syndrome missed
D3 extrinsic compression only visible when stomach is full and patient upright — always check in left lateral decubitus if D3 obstruction suspected
Confusion of gastric folds with mass
Rugal folds efface with distension; true mass does not — ensure adequate stomach distension before reporting filling defects
Step-by-step fluoroscopy technique and systematic search patterns available in RadCall Pro.
More in RadCall
99+ guides, IR procedure playbooks, systematic search patterns, case logging, and wRVU tracking — all in one place.